His Nibs brought one home tonight.
'You won't like it,' he said. 'It's horrible. I got it from someone at work. I don't know why I brought it home...' he places the offending article on the kitchen table.
I'm sick, as we know, so I'm not in a good mood to start with. I pick it up. I glare at him. I glare at it. I glare at him again. I thumb through its shiny pages. My eys are confused by the glaring images, the bright colours. Shocked and confused I try to make sense of it. I feel dizzy.
'Oh my god, that's disgusting. That's vile.'
'I know, I know, I knew you wouldn't like it.'
'But it's the NME. What have f**k they done to the NME?'
Yes, YOU Conor 'I'm-so-bloody-trendy-I-don't-have-a-last-name but I'm having my picture in on page 3'. What fresh Hell is this?
How have you managed to turn the layout of the NME into some unreadable explosion in a paint factory with some words and pictures thrown in? It's bitty, it's tedious, nothing flows and it's full of lists... and a bloody shopping guide!
Where are the words? Where are the writers of this generation? I grew up with Paul Morley, Julie Birchill, Tony Parsons. I read on with Stuart Marconie, Steve Lamaq. Aren't words important any more?
There's certainly lots of pictures. The NME now shamelessly features pop stars knocking 50 but uses photographs of them when they were in their 20s. Man over 30? Then put on these big dark sunglasses. Female over 30? Oh sorry can't see you - you don't exist. I know we live in a youth obsessed world but if you are going to listen to our music why can't you look at our faces?
I read the NME every week for years. Years and years. This is just horrible. It's like turning over the layout of the Guardian to The Star's subsdesk. This is some horrible teen-pop self-conscious, overly affected Smash Hits pastiche. Stop it.
And I'm now so cross I feel sick again. Excuse me....